![adobe photoshop cs2 raw converter adobe photoshop cs2 raw converter](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WJ2Fmfeynlo/maxresdefault.jpg)
Adobe photoshop cs2 raw converter manual#
The tool works well, but as with all "Auto" methods, sometimes further manual tweaking is required for optimal results, as shown in the second example. You only need to click in the neighborhood of the red eye and the correction happens automatically. The Red Eye Removal tool is also inherited from Photoshop Elements 3. Just like Photoshop Elements 3 inherited features from Photoshop CS, Photoshop CS2 has inherited some features from Photoshop Elements 3 which was launched about one year after Photoshop CS. Tools Inherited from Photoshop Elements 3 There has been no improvement in this regards compared to Photoshop CS. The Shadow/Highlight command should be used with caution as it can lead to posterizaton and halos around the edges between shadows and highlights. The Shadow/Highlight command introduced in Photoshop CS now also works in CMYk mode. Now wouldn't it be great to have this available as a Smart Sharpening Adjustment Layer? Shadow/Highlight in CMYk Bear in mind that the above example was exaggerated to illustrate the differences by pixel enlarging it to 200% and by choosing the usually not recommended parameters of Amount 200% and Radius 2. This way a similar perceived sharpness is created with tighter halos. Instead, the peak before the shadow valley (red arrow a) is pushed up and the valley after the highlight peak (red arrow b) is pushed down. The "squeezing" of the affected pixel range from 13 to 9 pixels does not result in the pushing down of the "shadow valley" or pushing up of the "highlight peak". The graph translates the brightness of the pixels into heights.įor the same radius, Lens Bblur affects pixels in a tighter range. This theoretical example shows the difference between the Smart Sharpen "Gaussian" algorithm, (which the regular Unsharp Mask uses) and the new "Lens Blur" algorithm. The above exaggerated theoretical examples were sharpened twice with sharpening parameters which are not recommended in order to make the differences between the two methods more visible. Compared to the third image, the second image has initially more sharpening in the darkest shadows, then about the same, and then sharpening becomes gradually weaker as you move to the highlights. The second image is the first image after applying smart sharpening to the shadows only, while the third image is the first image after applying the conventional unsharp mask. The first image is the original before any sharpening is applied.